Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?

Open links in new window

ARCHIVES

Feedback?...

EMAIL ME or AOL IM ME  

No more format wars!

No More Petitions!

Retriever Weekly Articles

Movies I Wanna See! (UPDATED! Recently!)

        LINKS AHOY!

     SEARCH THE NET

 What did you expect, Jeeves?                DVD/FILM        

 

  Roger Ebert on the Movies

[Roger Ebert on the Movies]

      

                   HUMOR                  (oft inappropriate, natch)        

[Something Awful]

 

 

 The Onion, America's Finest News Source[The Onion: This link required by law]

MISC. KNOWLEDGE

G33KY 5+UFF

TheForce.net

TheOneRing.net

TechTV.com

24 Forum

MISCELLANOUS    

FSHB ;-)

Spinsanity

Wil Wheaton      

Brooks's Site

UMBC: Homepage

           Livejournal

           Forums

Amazon.com

Want your link here? All you have to do is ask...

[Blue Ribbon Campaign- STOP CENSORSHIP!]
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

This page is powered by Blogger. No plagiarism, buster, or I'm callin' John Ashcroft!

Tuesday, January 21, 2003

 

Ehm... seemed certain that this would happen one of these days. It may have already, before this example, but I'm sure that this won't be the last...

Verizon Must Reveal Internet Song Swapper
Tue Jan 21, 7:42 PM ET

By Andy Sullivan [?]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Recording companies won a victory in their fight against online piracy on Tuesday when a U.S. court ordered Verizon Communications to turn over the name of a customer suspected of downloading more than 600 songs in one day over the Internet.

U.S. District Judge John Bates said Verizon must cooperate with recording industry efforts to track down online song swappers, rejecting the telecommunications giant's assertion that such a move would violate customer privacy and turn it into an online copyright cop.


Well, first of all, congrats to that guy for having such fat bandwidth! My eyes almost popped out of my head when I read that figure. It takes me... er, I mean, it WOULD take me about 25 minutes just to download one song, IF I were into that sort of thing. I'm on dial-up, ya know. *wink*

Seriously though, either way you look at it, this sets a pretty clear precedent for heavy MP3 downloaders.

Theoretical question: I know this is highly unlikely, but what if every single one of those songs was among those not considered copyrighted by the artist (but the record company doesn't approve of), i.e., live bootlegs, unreleased demos, etc.? Of course, I'm sure that isn't the case, but it just makes you think, what if I get nabbed for something the label thinks is bad, but the performer is OK with?

Oh yes, and props to Verizon for sticking up for private citizens. Not a free pass to jack up rates; just giving credit where it's due.

0 comments


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

_________________________________________________________

Want more coagulated brilliance? (And who doesn't?) Then go to the archives and read the oldies to your heart's content. Don't like this blog? Click here to move on to another... Come on back now, ya hear?